Alt30 · Municipal intelligence

← Map

Fiscal trajectory · Arizona

Where is this town headed?

Most municipal data reports where a town has been. This projects where its recurring revenue base is going on its current structure — and draws a hard line between the part already fixed by taxes the state has collected and the part that rests on a stated assumption. It is a conditional, not a prediction.

Show Low's recurring base grows to $38.8M by FY2031 — but rests on two legs, not three.

16.4% of the base is state-shared revenue — largely Urban Revenue Sharing, which is 18% of Arizona's income tax on a two-year lag. 83.6% is own-source, dominated by the city sales tax, which moves with the retail cycle. And Show Low levies no property tax — so there is no stable third leg to steady the base when the state economy or a state tax cut moves the other two.

$38.8M

projected recurring base, FY2031

16.4%

of the base is state-shared / income-tax linked

0%

property tax — the missing stabiliser

Recurring General Fund revenue by source, 20262031. The shaded years rest on our stated growth assumption; everything to the left is set by collected taxes or JLBC's published forecast.
State-shared (statutory)Own-source (local)shaded = past JLBC's horizon (assumption)

locked

FY26

set by taxes already collected

forecast

FY27–28

rests on JLBC's published estimate

projected

FY29–31

our stated growth assumption

Assumptions and method

This projects Show Low's recurring revenue base — not a surplus or deficit. Arizona budgeted expenditure authority includes contingency and fund-balance spend-down a town may never draw, so projecting spending off it would fabricate a gap. The base here is FY2025-26 budget, Schedule C — recurring General Fund, one-time grants removed.

The Urban Revenue Sharing line moves with the statutory pool — 18% of Arizona income tax, two years lagged (A.R.S. § 43-206) — applied to the town's own budgeted URS figure. FY2026 is locked: it is fixed by income taxes the state has already collected. The two years after rest on JLBC's published forecast. From FY2029 the income-tax base grows at a conservative 3.5% assumption.

Non-URS state-shared revenue grows at 3.0% a year (a conservative nominal pool rate, with the town's small population share held stable). Own-source revenue grows at 3.5% — the town's 1.0% decennial population growth plus 2.5% assumed inflation. Per-resident figures use the U.S. Census Bureau population estimate used for the FY 2024-25 shared-revenue distribution.

This is a conditional on those assumptions, not a prediction. It does not model a recession, an annexation, a new tax, or a change in state law — those belong to the scenario layer.

Scenario modeling

What bends the path?

The baseline holds current structure and current law. These levers are the questions a council actually faces — a state income-tax cut, a downturn in retail sales, faster or slower growth, and, for a town without one, adding a property tax. Each is arithmetic from statute or the town's own figures, not a guess at what will happen.

State individual income tax

Flows to Urban Revenue Sharing on a two-year lag.

Add a primary property tax

Rate per $100 of net assessed value. The missing third leg.

0.00

City sales-tax cycle

Annual own-source growth. Baseline 3.9%; a recession is negative.

3.9%

Population growth

Annual, per year. Baseline 1.4% (decennial trend).

1.4%

Adjust a lever to bend Mesa's baseline.

Recurring base: baseline versus scenario. Shaded years rest on stated growth assumptions past JLBC's horizon.
BaselineScenario
How the levers work

Income tax changes flow only to Urban Revenue Sharing, and only to its individual-income-tax share, on the two-year statutory lag (A.R.S. § 43-206) — so a change modelled from collection year 2025 first reaches the budget in FY2027. Corporate collections stay in the pool, which is why even “eliminated” does not zero URS.

Add a property tax applies a rate per $100 to Mesa's net assessed value of $5,166,278,257, derived from its secondary levy and rate — a real base, not an assumption. The assessed base is grown at inflation.

Sales-tax cycle and population growth replace the baseline growth assumptions for own-source revenue and residents. Everything else follows the baseline method. This is a set of conditionals, not a forecast of which will occur.

Mesa's filing reports state-shared revenue as a single line, so the Urban Revenue Sharing portion is isolated using the League of Arizona Cities' published URS/state-sales/vehicle-licence composition for Mesa. That aggregate matches the League's three-stream total within 1.3%.