How it compares · FY 2022
One schema, every town, same year.
Measured against 2,743–10,972 residents, on the one national source that puts every US city on identical definitions. Same year, same rules — the only honest way to compare one town's finances to another's.
$3,496
total revenue per resident · +41% vs peer median
#12
of 29 peers on spending per resident
5,486
residents, the basis for the peer group
Per resident
This town
Peer median
Rank
Total revenue
$3,496+41%
$2,481
9/29
Taxes
$892−10%
$995
16/29
Intergovernmental aid
$559−20%
$696
20/29
Fees & charges
$272−49%
$535
19/29
Total spending
$2,584+21%
$2,131
12/29
Operating spending
$2,517+47%
$1,712
10/29
Capital spending
$58−28%
$81
17/29
Long-term debt
$181−62%
$483
19/29
Peers, 2,743–10,972 residents: Benson, Bisbee, Carefree, Cave Creek, Clarkdale, Clifton, Dewey-Humboldt, Eagar, Globe, Guadalupe, Holbrook, Litchfield Park, Page, Parker, Pima, Pinetop-Lakeside, Safford, Sedona, Snowflake, South Tucson, St Johns, Taylor, Tolleson, Wickenburg, Willcox, Williams, Winslow, Youngtown.
How this is calculated›
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Census of Governments, Finance Component (released 2024-10-31). FY2022 actuals. Every figure is per resident, on the FY 2022 population used elsewhere in this profile. This layer is standardized for comparison and is a different vintage from the budget figures on the other tabs — the two are never added together. A $0 on a single line can mean a town genuinely has none or does not report it separately; the Census does not distinguish the two for one government, so a lone zero is shown, not scored.