How it compares · FY 2022
One schema, every town, same year.
Measured against 6,096–24,384 residents, on the one national source that puts every US city on identical definitions. Same year, same rules — the only honest way to compare one town's finances to another's.
$3,757
total revenue per resident · +54% vs peer median
#7
of 23 peers on spending per resident
12,192
residents, the basis for the peer group
Per resident
This town
Peer median
Rank
Total revenue
$3,757+54%
$2,433
7/23
Taxes
$1,611+91%
$842
7/23
Intergovernmental aid
$707+21%
$582
10/23
Fees & charges
$824+83%
$450
6/23
Total spending
$2,772+19%
$2,334
7/23
Operating spending
$2,033+7%
$1,892
12/23
Capital spending
$706+399%
$141
2/23
Long-term debt
$1,796+76%
$1,023
9/23
Peers, 6,096–24,384 residents: Camp Verde, Chino Valley, Coolidge, Cottonwood, Douglas, Eloy, Florence, Fountain Hills, Globe, Litchfield Park, Nogales, Page, Paradise Valley, Payson, Safford, Sedona, Snowflake, Somerton, Tolleson, Wickenburg, Winslow, Youngtown.
How this is calculated›
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Census of Governments, Finance Component (released 2024-10-31). FY2022 actuals. Every figure is per resident, on the FY 2022 population used elsewhere in this profile. This layer is standardized for comparison and is a different vintage from the budget figures on the other tabs — the two are never added together. A $0 on a single line can mean a town genuinely has none or does not report it separately; the Census does not distinguish the two for one government, so a lone zero is shown, not scored.