How it compares · FY 2022
One schema, every town, same year.
Measured against 3,590–14,358 residents, on the one national source that puts every US city on identical definitions. Same year, same rules — the only honest way to compare one town's finances to another's.
$3,842
total revenue per resident · +47% vs peer median
#9
of 29 peers on spending per resident
7,179
residents, the basis for the peer group
Per resident
This town
Peer median
Rank
Total revenue
$3,842+47%
$2,611
8/29
Taxes
$1,489+50%
$995
10/29
Intergovernmental aid
$763+20%
$638
9/29
Fees & charges
$556+8%
$514
13/29
Total spending
$2,691+15%
$2,334
9/29
Operating spending
$2,587+32%
$1,962
7/29
Capital spending
$103+5%
$98
14/29
Long-term debt
$0−100%
$703
23/29
Peers, 3,590–14,358 residents: Benson, Bisbee, Camp Verde, Carefree, Cave Creek, Chino Valley, Clarkdale, Clifton, Cottonwood, Dewey-Humboldt, Eagar, Guadalupe, Holbrook, Litchfield Park, Page, Paradise Valley, Pinetop-Lakeside, Safford, Sedona, Show Low, Snowflake, South Tucson, Taylor, Thatcher, Tolleson, Wickenburg, Winslow, Youngtown.
How this is calculated›
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Census of Governments, Finance Component (released 2024-10-31). FY2022 actuals. Every figure is per resident, on the FY 2022 population used elsewhere in this profile. This layer is standardized for comparison and is a different vintage from the budget figures on the other tabs — the two are never added together. A $0 on a single line can mean a town genuinely has none or does not report it separately; the Census does not distinguish the two for one government, so a lone zero is shown, not scored.